蜜桃视频app

Should Uber and Lyft drivers worry about robotaxis taking their rides? A new study points the way

First, it was the ride-share industry that disrupted traditional taxis. Now robotaxis are trying to disrupt the ride-share companies.

You can already ride in a driverless taxi in some American cities, with others, including D.C., moving closer to also legalizing them. But as Americans watch closely to see if and how AI might take over jobs, are ride-share drivers right to worry about the driverless taxis cutting into their livelihoods?

A new study suggests probably not, at least not any time soon.

A study conducted in part by University of Maryland Business School Professor Tunay Tunca looked at both sectors of that industry, in the United States and abroad. It finds that the original disruptors, the ride-share companies, continue to operate with two advantages over the robotaxi industry seeking to replace drivers. Both advantages focus on the age-old law of supply and demand.

鈥淲hen it comes to robot taxis, for instance, what they need to do is they need to build new cars 鈥 like way more,鈥 Tunca said. That takes a lot of time to build and a lot of money to buy them. For ride-share companies, 鈥渢o boost their supply, all they have to do is essentially incentivize the drivers a little bit more.鈥

And what鈥檚 the second advantage?

Ride-share platforms “don’t take as much risk, or, almost no risk,鈥 Tunca said. They 鈥渄on’t need to spend their own money, like hundreds of thousands of dollars, to get the extra cars. All they have to do is adjust their percentage, like commission, and then their supply increases. So this makes them much more robust.鈥

He said that while Uber and Lyft prices typically vary at any moment, the driverless taxis tend to have lower prices. But just beating ride-shares on cost isn鈥檛 enough when factoring in all the other expenses robotaxis have.

鈥淯ber is not investing their own capital purchasing cars,鈥 Tunca said. 鈥淎ll they’re doing is providing a platform, right? The drivers have those costs, so they’re (Uber, Lyft, and others) not actually risking their own money.鈥

The study argues that even if ride-share companies charge more in fares than the autonomous taxis do, their agility and ability to respond quickly, without losing money on cars that are just sitting idle, is what will set them apart. That advantage holds unless robotaxis can knock fares down to about half what ride-share companies charge. Tunca said it鈥檚 unlikely that would happen in the next five to 10 years.

鈥淚t’s going to be very difficult for a robot taxi company to completely uproot and replace a company like Uber or Lyft,鈥 he said. 鈥淚t’s going to be extremely difficult to put them out of business, because they can always expand capacity fast without putting their own money into purchasing cars.”

鈥淯ber and Lyft might be making less profit鈥 if ride-share companies get aggressive,鈥 Tunca said. 鈥淏ut they will still be viable and they will survive.鈥

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

漏 2026 蜜桃视频app. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

John Domen

John has been with 蜜桃视频app since 2016 but has spent most of his life living and working in the DMV, covering nearly every kind of story imaginable around the region. He鈥檚 twice been named Best Reporter by the Chesapeake Associated Press Broadcasters Association.聽

Federal News Network Logo
Log in to your 蜜桃视频app account for notifications and alerts customized for you.